Judicial Review

Public bodies make decisions that can significantly affect your life. If you believe a decision was made unlawfully, you may be able to challenge it through judicial review. Our experienced team helps clients hold public authorities to account, including local councils, the NHS, and statutory bodies.

Grey image placeholder with image icon centralised
Grey image placeholder with image icon centralised

Grounds for judicial review

We’ll assess the reasonableness of the decision you are seeking to challenge and determine whether it can be challenged on grounds of irrationality, illegality, or procedural impropriety. Working closely with specialist Counsel, we’ll advise on your chances of success and whether judicial review is the right route forward.

‍

Communicating with the public body

Before taking legal action, we’ll send clear and detailed correspondence to the relevant public body involved. This sets out the basis of your claim and requests key documents that support your case.

‍

Seeking permission

Judicial review involves a two-stage process. First, you must obtain the Court’s permission to proceed. Most applications are considered on paper, without a hearing. If permission is granted, your case moves forward, and the Court will then hold a substantive hearing.

‍

The decision

In judicial review, the Court is concerned only with the lawfulness of the decision. The Court will not assess the fairness (or otherwise) of the decision itself. We’ll build a case that shows the process was flawed, unlawful or unreasonable, giving you the best chance of a successful challenge.

‍

Suitable alternative remedy

Judicial review is a remedy of last resort. We'll explore all other possible remedies with you first, such as internal appeal processes and a referral to an Ombudsman.

Questions we’re often asked

Is there a time limit to bring a claim?

Yes. Judicial review is subject to strict deadlines. The time limit varies depending on the decision in question, so it’s important to get legal advice as soon as possible.

What can the Court order?

The Court has a range of powers, but the most common order sought in a judicial review is a quashing order (to unwind the decision being challenged).

How long will the claim take?

This depends on the facts of each case, but if permission is granted, it is likely to be in excess of 12 months to reach a substantive hearing.

Trusted by organisations, families and professionals across the UK
On billing, Darren has been consistently fair and transparent, something that matters enormously in high-cost, high-stakes litigation involving private individuals. At every stage, he has shown a genuine determination to protect his clients, financially as well as legally. These two are incredible assets to their firm.
Legal 500
Trusted by organisations, families and professionals across the UK
What makes Darren particularly remarkable is the lightness of touch he brings to even the most pressured situations. His good humor is not merely a personality trait; it is a professional asset that actively reduces client stress and keeps the team focused.
Legal 500
Trusted by organisations, families and professionals across the UK
Darren Morgan brings a rare combination of deep legal experience and exceptional interpersonal skill. His insights and strategic guidance throughout every stage of proceedings have been invaluable, and his judgment inspires real confidence.
Legal 500
Trusted by organisations, families and professionals across the UK
Andrew has no ego about where the best idea comes from; what matters to him is reaching the right decision, and that collaborative instinct makes him not only an excellent lawyer but a genuine partner in the process.
Legal 500
Trusted by organisations, families and professionals across the UK
Andrew Morgan is methodical and considered, never rushed, yet equally open to challenge and new thinking.
Legal 500
Trusted by organisations, families and professionals across the UK
Andrew Morgan (Senior Associate Solicitor) is quite an exceptional legal mind. What distinguishes Andrew is his ability to think deeply and strategically about every aspect of a case, approaching each decision as though his own money were on the line. That quality of personal investment is rare and enormously reassuring in high-stakes litigation.
Legal 500
Trusted by organisations, families and professionals across the UK
The team gets to know its clients’ businesses, many of which are based in the same region as Blacks, extremely well. This enables Blacks to put together litigation teams best suited to the clients’ differing needs.
Legal 500
Trusted by organisations, families and professionals across the UK
A talented team with a broadly based expertise in high-value commercial and corporate disputes (often with an employment element). They have a specialism in senior executive disputes.
Legal 500
Trusted by organisations, families and professionals across the UK
A team of very personable, tenacious, and razor-sharp litigators with a key focus on clients' objectives. An excellent range of expertise and experience to meet client needs on any particular case.
Legal 500
Trusted by organisations, families and professionals across the UK
Aimee Hutchinson is a pleasure to work with. She is practical, straightforward, uses language that is easy to understand and relatable. She clearly explains all available options and gives her view and recommendation as to the most appropriate course of action.
Legal 500

Need an expert in

dispute resolution

?

For more information or a no obligation discussion, please call or email our team today.

Smiling woman in a yellow shirt shaking hands with another person during a meeting.
Smiling woman in yellow shirt shaking hands with another person across a table in an office setting.